案例G公司就2万吨级码头散装物料中转库建设及装卸作业项目招标,共有D公司、Y公司等五家公司递交了投标文件。2014年3月6日,G公司通知各投标人,因招标文件并未设定评标标准,故本项目不开标。2014年3月28日,G公司重新发布投标邀请函,其中规定“八、选取承包方的评分标准:发包方根据以下各项得分计算总分,选取最高分者为候选承包方。1.年业务保底量40万吨、履约保证金200万元,得分40分。2.在 Case G The Company tendered tender for the construction and loading and unloading of bulk cargo transit warehouses of 20,000-ton wharf. A total of five companies, D Company and Y Company, submitted the bidding documents. March 6, 2014, G Company informed bidders, because the tender documents did not set the evaluation criteria, so the project does not open the tender. On March 28, 2014, Company G re-issued the invitation letter, which stipulated ”Eight, select the contractor’s grading standards: Employer calculated the total score based on the following points, select the highest score as the candidate contractor. At the end of the amount of 400,000 tons of business security, performance bonds 2 million yuan, score 40 points