论文部分内容阅读
本案涉及发明专利临时保护期内侵权的相关法律问题,目前就本案涉及的使用人在发明专利临时保护期内购买的侵权产品应否支付临时保护期使用费问题,主要存在两种意见,第一种为:生产者需要支付,而销售者、使用者在提供侵权产品的合法来源的情况下不需支付;第二种为:只要在临时保护期内有实施侵权产品的行为,实施者都应支付使用费。笔者以这则案例出发,对上述问题作出阐述,以与法律学人共同探讨。
This case involves the legal issues related to infringement during the temporary protection period of the invention patent. At present, there are mainly two opinions on whether the infringement products purchased by the user in the temporary protection period of the invention patent should pay for the use of the temporary protection period. The first Species: producers need to pay, and sellers, users do not have to pay in the case of providing legal sources of infringing products; The second is: as long as there is infringement of the product within the temporary protection period, the implementer should Payment of usage fee. In this case, the author sets out to elaborate on the above issues and discuss it with legal scholars.