苏洵的《六国论》(部编高中语文课本第三册)本来是一篇精辟的脍炙人口的历史论文,文章并不太深,但由于几种“拐棍书”说法不一,引起教师们的争论,给教学造成混乱,有的甚至传授错误的知识。爰书管见,以供切磋。一、“赂秦而力亏,破灭之道也。”这两句话,湖北省编《语文教学参考资料》(以下简称《资料》)和沔阳师范函授部编的《古代诗文选讲》(以下简称《选讲》)分别译为“……这就是灭亡的道路啊!”和“……促使自己走向灭亡的道路”。把“道”解为“路”,是可 Su Shi’s “Theory of the Six Kingdoms” (Volume III of the Department of High School Chinese Textbooks) was originally an insightful historical paper. The article was not very deep, but the teachers were confused because of the different arguments of several “candlestick books”. The controversy caused confusion in teaching, and some even taught wrong knowledge. See the book for discussion. First, “Bringing the Qin to Liability and Breaking Down the Road.” These two sentences, Hubei Province, “Language Teaching Reference Materials” (hereinafter referred to as “Information”) and the Selection of Ancient Poems Selected by Fuyang Teachers’ Correspondence Department (hereinafter referred to as “election”) is translated as “...this is the path to perish!” and “...prompt yourself to the path of demise.” The solution of “Tao” as “Road” is