社科法学强调对于“现实”与“中国”的关注,批评教义法学是一个不顾国情的舶来品,这样的看法源于社科法学与教义法学对中国法律实践的认识分歧。社科法学强调中国法律实践中合法性评价的多元性,审判活动与日常判断的相似性;而教义法学则主张实证法秩序在合法性评价上的权威性,以及审判活动中法律思维的特殊性。法学的跨领域研究必须从法学的立场出发,法学理论并非现实的摹写,社科法学在研究方法和理论主张两方面都应有足够的自觉。 The social science jurisprudence emphasizes the concern about “reality ” and “China ”, and criticizes doctrine jurisprudence as a circumvention of national conditions. This view stems from the disagreement on Chinese law practice between social science jurisprudence and doctrine jurisprudence. Social science jurisprudence emphasizes the diversity of legitimacy evaluation in Chinese legal practice and the similarities between trial activity and daily judgment. And doctrinal jurisprudence advocates the authority of the legitimacy order in legitimacy evaluation and the particularity of legal thinking in judicial activity . The interdisciplinary study of law must proceed from the standpoint of jurisprudence. The theory of law is not an actual copy, and the law of social sciences should be sufficiently conscious both in research methods and in theory.