《陈旉农书》,由南宋江苏仪征县县令洪兴祖以政府名义刻版发行并撰写了《题后》,他对陈旉及其农书推崇备至迥旰?1154),洪兴祖遭到秦桧弹劾,陈旉立即补写《后记》,怒斥洪兴祖臆改原稿,错误百出,故取出家藏副本,恢复原貌,待机再版,发泄了作者的愤懑。近半个世纪以来,许多国内外学者从各个方面对《农书》作过深入的探讨,但均未有涉及《后记》之研究。笔者1984年撰写了《关于陈旉<农书>两个问题商榷》,对《后记》曾提出怀疑,由于过略,未能尽言,故现从五个方面分析《后记》之言不足信和产生《后记》的时代背景。 “Chen Kui Nong Shu” by the Southern Song Dynasty Yizheng county magistrate Hongxingzu published in the name of the government engraved edition and wrote a “title”, he was Chen Yong and his agricultural books are highly recommended ~  旰 旰 旰 1152), Hong Xingzu Qin Hui impeachment, Chen Kui immediately wrote “Postscript”, anger Hong Xingzu pretended to modify the manuscript, a hundred mistakes, it removed a copy of home possession, restore the original appearance, standby reprint, vent the author’s resentment. Nearly half a century, many domestic and foreign scholars from all aspects of the “agricultural book” made in-depth discussions, but none of the “postscript” research. In 1984, the author wrote “On the Two Issues about Chen Jian’s Calligraphy and Calligraphy”, which raised doubts about “Postscript” and failed to give up his speech because of his negligence. Therefore, the author analyzes the shortcomings of “Postscript” from five aspects Produce “postscript” background of the times.