论文部分内容阅读
《增订中国史学史资料编年》四卷本出版后,虽得学界诸多好评,但仍然留下一些尚须梳理的问题。作为该书的作者之一,本人有五点新的认识:《宋书》、《魏书》皆属于官修史;《资治通鉴纲目》的编纂中,赵师渊的贡献其实不大;明代《咸宾录》一书之刘一焜《序》内的星岁纪年,是依据汉代刘歆的《三统历》,这通过民间学者刘坦的著述可以破解;而清入关前纂修的太祖实录,书名有过几次变化;康熙年间之戴名世文字狱,促使王鸿绪匆忙地进呈《明史列传稿》。这些关于中国史学史方面的认识,值得关注。
After the publication of the four volumes of the Chronicle of the History of the History of Chinese Historiography, many problems have still to be sorted out in spite of much acclaim from academics. As one of the authors of the book, I have five new understandings: “Song book”, “Wei book” belong to the history of official compilation; “Zhangtong guideline compilation”, Zhao Shiyuan contribution is not big; Ming Dynasty “ The ”Year of the Chronicle“ in Liu Xian’s ”Preface“ by Liu Yixun, a book written by Xianbin Bin, is based on the ”Three-State Calendar" by Liu Xin in the Han Dynasty. This can be solved through the writings of Liu Tan, a folk scholar. Taizu real record, there are several changes in the title of the book; the reign of Emperor Wen Xi during the reign of Emperor Kangxi, prompting Wang Hongxu hurriedly appeared in the Ming Dynasty Biography. These understandings about the history of Chinese history are worth noting.