论文部分内容阅读
此篇文章,从文面看是作者在教学过程中的一些做法及看法,为了教学内容的改革,做了大量工作,应该予以肯定。就文论文,无需再费笔墨,但如果您换个角度去琢磨,则感觉还有更深层次的意义:即教学改革究竟应该怎么做。作者在文首提出来的问题,实质上是课程改革中少数课程改革单马独进所带来的问题。曾记否,当教育改革从管理体制改革深化到教学改革的时候,就有人提醒,教学改革是系统工程,应该统筹规划;也有人指出了教学改革涉及到育人的质量,一定要谨慎从事、稳扎稳打。本文作者所遇到的问题,不就再次证明了教学改革、课程改革统筹规划的重要吗!对某一门课程内容的取舍,如果单就课程论课程,也许是对的,如果将其放在整个课程体系中去审视,就不见得合理了,您说对吗?
This article from the perspective of the author is in the teaching process of some practices and opinions, in order to reform the teaching content, a lot of work should be affirmed. On the paper, no need to waste ink, but if you look at it from another angle, then there is a deeper sense of the significance: that teaching reform should be how to do. The question the author put forward at the beginning of the article is essentially the question brought about by the reform of the minority courses in the curriculum reform. I remember once that when the education reform deepened from the reform of the management system to the teaching reform, some people reminded that the teaching reform was a systematic project and should be planned as a whole. It was also pointed out that teaching reform involves the quality of educating people and must be cautious. Stable. The problems encountered by the author of this article, not once again proved that teaching reform, curriculum reform, integrated planning is important! The choice of a course content, if the course on the curriculum may be right, if it is on The whole course system to look at, not necessarily justified, you’re right?