哈耶克和弗里德曼的方法论思想上也有区别。1985年,哈耶克曾说过下面一段话: 问:你在芝加哥大学的量候,芝加哥学派是否受到你的影响? 答:西蒙斯本来最有希望,他的去世实在是场灾难。其他人,从方法论上看,他们实际上都是宏观经济学家,而不是微观经济学家。他们中间,斯蒂格勒是程度最轻的,而弗里德曼则是最严重的。这始终是困扰我的难题。米尔顿和我几乎在所有问题上的看法一致,只有货币政策是个例外。但这一问题 There are also differences in methodological thinking between Hayek and Friedman. In 1985, Hayek once said the following passage: Q: When you are at the University of Chicago, are the Chicago schools affected by you? A: Simmons was the most hopeful, and his death was actually a catastrophe. Others, from a methodological point of view, are in fact macro economists, not microeconomists. Among them, Stigler is the lightest, while Friedman is the most serious. This is always a bothering my problem. Milton and I agree on almost every issue, except that monetary policy is an exception. But this problem