《饮冰室诗话》因人民文学出版社的多次出版而广为人知。然而《饮冰室诗话》的本来面目及辑录情况却鲜为人知。本文以《新民丛报》原刊为底本,以翔实的前人辑录文献为依据,对一百年来的辑录情况进行了系统考察。指出,一、某些影响较大的权威著作如《梁启超著述系年》及《清诗话考》中关于《诗话》的说明存在讹误。二、已有辑录文献均存在不同情状的问题:有的虽按《诗话》在《丛报》上的刊载顺序辑录,但辑录量太少;有的辑录量虽然较多,但存在不同程度的编排讹误;有的虽然收录了《诗话》的全部内容,但因所据底本原因未能纠正前人讹误。三、最为遗憾的是,至今为止大陆和台湾地区尚无一本内容完整且编排顺序与《诗话》在原刊上一致的单行本。文章指出并分析了上述诸多问题,提出重新辑录出版《诗话》单行本之必要。 “Drinking Ice Room Poetry” is widely known because of the numerous publications of People’s Literature Publishing House. However, “drinking ice room poetry,” the true colors and the situation is rarely known. Based on the original Xinmin Cong newspaper, this paper systematically examines the compilation of records over the past 100 years on the basis of informative records of previous books. Pointed out: First, some of the most influential authoritative writings such as “Liang Qichao’s Describing Year” and “Qing Poems and Calligraphy” on the “poetry” in the description of corruption. Second, there are problems existing in the recorded and recorded documents. Although some books are recorded in the order of publication of “The Book of Poetry” in the “Cong Bao”, the amount of records is too small. Although there are many recorded volumes, there are different degrees of Arrangements for corruption; some even included the “poetic” of the entire content, but because of the underlying reasons failed to correct the previous corruption. Third, what is most regrettable is that so far there is no single book in mainland China and Taiwan that is complete in content and arranged in the same order as that of “The Book of Poetry” in the original issue. The article points out and analyzes the many problems mentioned above and proposes the necessity of re-editing and publishing the single script of “poetry.”