“碧纯”水与“延中”水纠纷被人们称为沪上一大奇案。笔者认为该案之所以引人注目,不仅曾因原告是否具有诉讼主体资格等程序问题困挠法院数月,以及在法庭审理中出现四名被告代理人集体退庭的极为罕见的一幕,更为重要的是它暴露了我国相关立法的空白,引发了人们对于合资企业中外方出资者的保护、董事竞业禁止义务以及如何完善我国公司法、外资企业法等问题的更深层次的思考。本文试在阐述基本案情的基础上,就相关问题谈几点粗浅看法,希望能够抛砖引玉。一、基本案情 “Pure water” and “Yanzhong” water dispute was known as a big surprise case in Shanghai. The author thinks that the reason why the case attracted attention was that it was even more important that not only had it been months before the plaintiffs had a procedural qualification such as the qualification of the litigant, but also the extremely rare scene of the collective withdrawal of four defendant agents during court proceedings It exposes the blank of related legislation in our country and triggers a deeper reflection on the protection of foreign investors in foreign joint ventures, the prohibition of director’s non-competition and the improvement of our company law and foreign-funded enterprise law. Based on the exposition of the basic case, this article tries to talk a few superficial opinions on related issues and hopes to start a discussion. First, the basic case