近來,由於巴甫洛夫學說不斷地發展,學者們提供了很多有關神經系統影響生物免疫反應性的新的研究成果,從而豐富了免疫的概念,豐富了抗體形成的機制問題,同時也為進一步深入而全面地研究這些問題奠定了良好的基礎。許多試驗證明,神經系統對於抗體的產生具有重要的意義。但是,關於А.Н.Гор-диенко氏在他的著作Нервнорефлекторныймеханизмвыраьоткиантителирегуляциифагоцитоза(медгиз—1954—москва)一書中極力主張的,僅以抗原刺激未免疫動物的神經感受器(皮膚、血管及內臟感受器等)而無抗原的吸收(抗原不與產生抗體的裝置直接接觸),即能反射的引起特異性抗體產生的這一觀點,在一些學者則具有不同的見解。例如,П.Ф.Эдродовский氏寫道:“第一次注射抗原時,若無 Recently, thanks to the continuous development of Pavlov’s doctrine, scholars have provided many new research results on the nervous system affecting biological immunoreactivity, thereby enriching the concept of immunity and enriching the mechanism of antibody formation, The thorough and comprehensive study of these issues has laid a good foundation. Numerous experiments have shown that the nervous system is of great importance for the production of antibodies. However, regarding А.Н.Гор-диенко’s assertion in his book Нервнорефлекторныймеханизмвыраьоткиантителирегуляциифагоцитоза (медгиз-1954-москва) that only antigens stimulate the neurotransmitters (skin, blood vessels and visceral receptors) The idea that antigen-free uptake, in which the antigen is not in direct contact with the device that produces the antibody, ie, which can cause specific antibodies to be reflected, has a different view in some scholars. For example, П.Ф.Эдродовский wrote: ”The first injection of antigen, if not