近年来,随着对洋务运动的深入讨论,以及对一些洋务派代表人物的具体分析,重新评价洋务派的问题也就提出来了。有些问题尚待深入探讨,如划分洋务派的标准是什么;洋务派与外国侵略者之间勾结是主要的还是矛盾是主要的;洋务派与顽固派是一丘之貉还是方向之争?也即如何看待洋务派在中国近代史上的功过是非。本文想就这些问题,谈一点粗浅之见。 In recent years, with the in-depth discussions on the Westernization Movement and the specific analysis of some of the representatives of the Westernizationists, the issue of reevaluation of the Westernizationists has been raised. Some questions remain to be explored in depth. For example, what are the criteria for the division of the Westernization School? What is the primary or contradiction between the Westernization and the foreign aggressors? Is the Westernization and the die-hardship the same? The Westernization School in the history of China’s merits and demerits. This article wants to talk about these issues, talk about a little superficial opinion.