按国际通用技术标准,实现现有电工产品的更新换代,以适应我国社会主义四个现代化建设的需要,固然是我们所面临的迫切任务,但就电工产品的出口而言,则更是当务之急。现仅就此,谈几点意见,不妥之处,请批评指正。一、按国际通用技术标准,提高电工产品的水平,是扩大出口的根本途径。电工产品在国际贸易中占有相当的比重,而我国出口的电工产品不到其中的千分之一,与世界各大电气公司比较:西德西门子公司在国外的销售额占其总营业额的百分之五十,日本日立公司则高达百分之六十,美国国内市场广大,但通用电气公司的出口额仍占百分之二十五,西屋公司的出口额则近百分之三十,我国电工产品的出口虽然近年有较大的增长,但尚不到全行业总产值的百分之四,相比之下,差距很大,而且目前出口的产品,在国际市场上,也属于低档货,靠廉价出售,亏损很大,换汇率低,其根本原因是我国出口的电工产品,其技术标准满 According to international general technical standards, the upgrading of existing electrical products to meet the needs of China’s four modernizations of socialism is of course an urgent task for us. However, in terms of exports of electrical products, it is even more urgent. We will only talk about a few points here and we will criticize and correct me. First, according to international general technical standards, improving the level of electrical products is the fundamental way to expand exports. Electrotechnical products occupies a considerable proportion in international trade, and China’s export of electrical products is less than one thousandth of them, compared with the world’s major electrical companies: West German Siemens’ foreign sales account for 100% of its total turnover. At 50 percent, Hitachi, Japan, is as high as 60 percent. The United States has a large domestic market, but General Electric still accounts for 25 percent of exports, and Westinghouse exports nearly 30 percent. Although the export of electrical products in China has grown significantly in recent years, it is still less than 4% of the total output value of the industry. In contrast, the gap is large, and the current export products are also low in the international market. The goods are sold at a low price, they have large losses, and exchange rates are low. The underlying reason is the export of electrical products in China. Its technical standards are full.