本文通过几种不同语篇的实际分析,比较了英汉语篇照应手段的特点及其异同。数据统计结果表明,人称照应手段的运用比较频繁,这与其自身的可及性相关;此外英汉语中照应手段的运用并不完全对应;有些照应词的运用并不能照应上下文出现的先行词,而有的照应词却可以照应前文或后文出现的整个句子或段落。 This article compares the characteristics and similarities and differences between English and Chinese interpretative means through the actual analysis of several different discourses. The statistical results show that the use of personal anaphora means is relatively frequent, which is related to its own accessibility; in addition, the use of anaphora means in English and Chinese does not correspond exactly; the use of some anaphoric words does not take care of the antecedent words in context. Some anaphoric words can take care of the entire sentence or paragraph that appears before or after.