论文部分内容阅读
临床医务人员经常指出,足的结构与其易受的损伤之间存在着一定的关系。例如,Subotnick(1975)曾将各种运动损伤的情况与各类特殊的足型联系起来分析。但是,迄今为止在足的结构分类上依然存在着很大的混乱。在临床实践上,很少有人对足的结构进行定量测量(除了X射线测量以外)。对加拿大和英国军队新兵进行的两项重研究,表明了缺乏足型分类定量标准的窘况。Harris和Beath(1947)对7,000多名加拿大士兵的足作了分析。Hewitt,Stewart和Webb(1953)对22,000多名战时英国新兵的足进行了检查。Harris和Beath的结果指出,扁平足占22.5%,空凹足占11.8%,Hewitt等则报道扁平足和空凹足分另只占6%和1%。
Clinicians often point out that there is a relationship between the structure of the foot and its susceptible lesions. For example, Subotnick (1975) analyzed a variety of sports injuries in association with a variety of special foot types. However, so far there has been considerable disruption in the structural classification of foot. In clinical practice, few people quantitatively measure the structure of the foot (except for X-ray measurements). Two major studies of recruits from the Canadian and British military forces have shown the dilemma of lacking quantitative footprints. Harris and Beath (1947) analyzed the foot of more than 7,000 Canadian soldiers. Hewitt, Stewart and Webb (1953) examined the foot of more than 22,000 wartime British recruits. According to the results of Harris and Beath, 22.5% of flat feet and 11.8% of open cut feet, Hewitt et al. Reported that only 6% and 1% of flat feet and empty cut points respectively.