王某是某厂司机,厂里把轿车送至修理公司修理,预计修理费3万元,而王某醉酒后却给修理公司写下5万余元的欠条。法院根据有关规定,判决这起承揽合同修理费纠纷案,该厂虽一再声称欠条是司机醉酒后所写,但仍被法院判决给付轿车维修公司修理费5万余元。 法院认为,司机王某的欠条上写明欠修理费5万余元,虽未经单位授权,但 Wang is a factory driver, the factory sent to the car repair company repair, repair costs are estimated 30,000 yuan, but after Wang drunk to 50,000 yuan wrote to the repair company IOU. The court ruled in accordance with the relevant provisions of this contract contract repair costs dispute case, although the factory repeatedly claimed that the IOUs written by the driver drunk, but still the court awarded the car repair company repair costs 50,000 yuan. The court held that the driver of IOU owed more than 50,000 yuan owed repair fees, although not authorized by the unit, but