论文部分内容阅读
本文对上古汉语次清声母的构拟依据提出质疑。同时,根据当今世界语言及中国各族语言以塞音清、浊二分的平衡格局为主流,原始藏缅语、原始侗台语只有清、浊声母的对立,中古汉语次清声母大多源于上古的清流鼻音、带前缀声母、复辅音等,上古汉语经典文献中的“声变构词”主要是清、浊声母的变换,本文提出设想:先秦汉语音系里的次清声母尚不具备独立音类地位,汉语塞音声母的分类格局经历了上古清、浊二分(平衡)→中古全清、全浊、次清三分(不平衡)→近代官话全清、次清二分(平衡)的演变过程。
This article questions the basis of the construction of the second clear initials in ancient Chinese. At the same time, according to today’s world languages and Chinese national languages, the balanced pattern of “syllable-clear and turbid dichotomies” prevails. The primitive Tibetans and Burmese languages, the original Kam-Tai language only have the opposite between clear and voiced initials, and most of the clear Chinese initials come from the ancient Qing dynasty nasal tone, with initial consonants, complex consonants, ancient Chinese classics literature “Acoustic variant ” is mainly clear, voiced initials transformation, the paper proposes that: Pre-Qin Chinese phonetic sub-clear initials are not yet available The status of independent soundclosons and the initials of Chinese stoppops have undergone the classification of ancient Qing and turbid dichotomy (balance) → middle and late Qing Dynasty, total turbidity and secondary clear (unbalanced) The evolution of the process.