论文部分内容阅读
迄今为止,人们关于王羲之草书的评论,多停留在钟张二王的质妍优劣之争,以及诸如“龙跳天门、虎卧凤阙”(梁武帝)、“古今莫二”(羊欣)、“尽善尽美”(李世民)等笼而统之的感觉陈述中。不仅很少有如对行书《兰亭序》,《圣教序》那样的热情关注,更没有人对包括《十七帖》在内的草书代表作进行深入研究。从前面的考证和解析已知,《十七帖》是王羲之永和十一年(355)誓墓归田之后,直到逝世前的六七
So far, people’s comments on cursive Wang Xizhi, more than stay in the Zhong Ye Wang Er quality dispute, as well as such as “Dragon jump Tianmen, Tiger lying Feng Que” (Liang Wudi), “ ”(Yang Yan), “ perfect ”(Li Shimin) and other cages and the feeling of the statement. Not only are there few enthusiasm concerns such as the “Lanting Preface” and “Prelusive Preface”, but no one has conducted any further study on cursive masterpieces including “The 17th Post.” From the previous textual research and analysis, it is known that “The Seventeen Posts” is the eternal eleven years of Wang Xizhi (355)