论文部分内容阅读
本世纪20年代,德国包浩斯学校提出“艺术与技术新的统一”的理念,从此开创了艺术教育加技术教育的设计教育两元性模式.许多设计系科在艺术教育——主要指美术教育基础上增加一些技术教育——主要指工程教育课程;也有些设计系科在工程技术教育之外,增加一些美术基础训练.多年以来,在这种模式下的确也培养出不少设计人才,因此人们都认为它是正确的.然而,二次世界大战以后,随着人们对设计本质认识的深化,有人对设计教育的传统两元性模式提出了异议.例如德国的乌尔姆造型学院(ULM)的第三任院长摩特拉多(Tomas Maldonado)在1956年便说:“美学因素只是设计者可能控制的因素之一,它既不是主要因素,也不是支配因素.还存在着工艺、结
In the 1920s, Bauhaus School in Germany proposed the concept of “new unity of art and technology” and started the dualistic model of design education in art education and technology education. Many design departments in art education - mainly arts Some education on the basis of technical education - mainly refers to the engineering education curriculum; some design department in addition to engineering and technical education, to add some basic training in fine arts. Over the years, this model has indeed produced a lot of design talent, So people think it is correct.However, with the deepening of people’s understanding of the nature of design after the Second World War, some people have raised objections to the traditional duality model of design education.For example, the Ulm Sculpture Institute in Germany ( ULM’s Tomas Maldonado, the third dean of the ULM, said in 1956: "Aesthetics is but one of the factors that a designer may control and is neither a predominant factor nor a dominant one. Knot