论文部分内容阅读
自80年代以来,档案期刊发展极快。目前,全国已有各级各类档案期刊70余种,国内和国内外公开(CN和ISSN/CN)发行的档案期刊已超出20种。档案期刊评价属档案学术评论之出版物评论范畴,于期刊建设有导向和指导作用,是促进档案期刊水平稳步提高的重要手段和必要保证。然而,目前档案期刊评价却明显滞后于期刊的发展。究其原因,笔者以为根本症结在于对档案期刊评价自身研究的落后,尤以
Archival journals have grown rapidly since the 1980s. At present, there are more than 70 kinds of archival journals at all levels and more than 20 archival journals have been issued at home and abroad (CN and ISSN / CN). The evaluation of archives journals which belong to the scope of publication review of archival academic reviews plays a guiding and guiding role in the construction of periodical journals and is an important means and necessary guarantee for the steady improvement of archival periodicals. However, the current evaluation of archives journals obviously lags behind the development of journals. The reason, I think the crux of the problem lies in the backward evaluation of archival journals themselves, especially