论文部分内容阅读
在都江堰市打工的遂宁农民廖福中,因不满被老板辞退,便用烟头引燃棉絮,结果酿成火灾。2002年3月6日,都江堰市法院以放火罪判处廖福中有期徒刑三年。 2001年8月,19岁的廖福中经熟人介绍,到都江堰市幸福路一家娱乐城当清洁工,月工资300元。干了一段时间后,娱乐城对他的表现不满意。当年11月15日上午,娱乐城负责人对他宣布了辞退决定,并告知其归还娱乐城用品,结清工资走人。廖福中闷闷不乐地收拾好娱乐城发给他的工作服及棉絮、棉被等物品,在向库房保管员移交这些东西时,他悄悄将一颗点燃的烟头塞进了棉絮中,然后领了当月的140元工资,坐出租车离开了娱乐城。他离开20多分钟后,娱乐城的库房便冒出了滚滚黑烟,后经及时扑救,才没有酿成更大的火灾。经公安消防大队认定,此次火灾系“他人故意扔烟头,引燃可燃物所致”。11月16日,廖福中被抓获。法院认为,廖福中因对娱乐城的辞退处理不满,用烟头引燃棉絮,不仅危及娱乐城本身,也对周围的居民、商家造成了威胁,其行为已构成放火罪,遂依法做出了上述判决。
Liao Fuzhong, a farmer working in Suining, Dujiangyan, ignited his baton with cigarette butts because of dissatisfaction and was dismissed by his boss, resulting in a fire. March 6, 2002, Dujiangyan City Court sentenced to arson Liu Fau set a three-year prison term. August 2001, 19-year-old Liao Fuzhong acquaintances introduced to the entertainment city of Dujiangyan City, a happy road as a cleaner, 300 yuan monthly salary. After some time, Casino was not satisfied with his performance. On the morning of November 15 that year, the person in charge of entertainment city announced the decision of dismissing him and told him to return entertainment supplies to settle the problem of leaving the wage. Liao Fuzhong bored to pack his entertainment and cotton batting, quilts and other items, handed over to the storekeeper these things, he quietly put a lit cigarette into the cotton, and then received the 140 Yuan salary, left the entertainment city by taxi. After he left more than 20 minutes, the entertainment city’s warehouse will emerge billowing smoke, after a timely rescue, did not lead to a bigger fire. The fire brigade determined by the police, the Department of fire “deliberately throw cigarette butts ignited by others, ”. November 16, Liao Fuzhong was captured. The court held that because of dissatisfaction with the dismissal of Casino Entertainment, Liao Fuzhong used cigarette butts to ignite cotton batting, which not only endangered the casino itself, but also caused threats to residents and merchants in the surrounding areas. His acts constituted arson crime and the ruling was made in accordance with the law .