“大某山民”姚燮与“护花主人”王希廉、“太平闲人”张新之,同为有清一代“旧红学”评点派的翘楚。然自民初胡适创建“新红学”之后,学界受其影响而对评点派的观点颇多偏见,且整体评价流于刻板印象之中而缺乏更进一步的理解兴趣。这样的偏执观念,一直到20世纪末期开始,才渐渐打破。其中,姚燮评点的特色已受到一定程度的关注,惟整体来说,仍然有所不足。事实上,评论姚燮批语的特点,有一个根本疑虑必须解决,就是姚氏是否涉及“抄袭”的问题。就姚氏批点来看,两个部份有所争议:一则为《大某山民总评》是否抄袭姜祺《红楼梦诗》?二则是姚氏“随文评点”是否来自“东观阁本”《新增批评锈像红楼梦》?截至目前为止,就笔者所知,尚未有相关论文对此课题作一通盘检视。笔者不揣简陋,以姚燮评点《红楼梦》所牵涉“抄袭”问题作为论文探讨主轴,期待能对“旧红学”的评点研究另添视野。 “Big Moumingshan ” Yao Xie and “Hugh Flower Master ” Wang Xi Lian, “Pacific people ” Zhang Xinzhi, with the same generation as the However, since the early Republic of China founded “New Learning” by Hu Shi, there was a lot of prejudice against the views of the critics by the academic circles and the overall evaluation was in a stereotype with no further understanding. This paranoid concept did not break until the late 20th century. Among them, the features of Yao Xie’s commentaries have received some degree of attention, but on the whole, there are still some deficiencies. In fact, there is one basic question that must be answered when commenting on the features of Yao Xie’s remark: Is Yao’s question of “plagiarism”? Yao’s point of criticism, the two parts of the controversial: one is “a mountain villager” is a copy of Jiang Qi “Dream of Red Mansions”? Two is Yao’s “With the commentary” is from “East View Court ” “New critique of rust like a Dream of Red Mansions”? So far, as far as I know, there is no related papers on this subject to make a comprehensive review. The author does not hides the simple, with Yao Xie comment on “Dream of Red Mansions” involved “plagiarism ” as the main topic of the paper, looking forward to “Old Red ” review of the study of additional vision.