几年来,不少人主张以“详独略同”体现和反映地方特色,并奉为“至宝”和“灵丹妙药”.但实践的结果证明,它貌似合理,实则本末倒置,以偏概全,根本不会也不可能正确体现地方特色.而“求同存异”才是比较科学的做法.可贵处在于它能较好地体现马列主义、毛泽东思想的理论指导,运用辩证唯物主义和历史唯物主义的观点和方法,对整个客观事物进行研究分析.并把握重点,全面记述,从而达到反映地方特色,增强志书科学性、整体性和经世致用的目的.故“详独略同”不可取,应该休矣! Over the past few years, many people advocate “reflecting the same principle but with different aspects” and embodying local characteristics, and are regarded as the “treasure” and “the miraculous cure.” However, the result of practice proves that it is plausible but in fact the cart before the horse is reversed, Can not and can not properly reflect the local characteristics, while “seeking common grounds while shelving differences” is a more scientific approach.The valuable point is that it can better reflect the theoretical guidance of Marxism-Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought, and use the views of dialectical materialism and historical materialism Method, researching and analyzing the whole objective things, grasping the key points and comprehensively describing them, so as to achieve the purpose of reflecting the local characteristics and enhancing the scientificalness, integrity and practicality of the books. Hugh