论文部分内容阅读
2010年最高人民法院和最高人民检察院分别出台了《关于案例指导工作的规定》,标志着我国案例指导制度的正式建立。截止2016年3月,最高法院已经发布了11批56个指导性案例,在指导性案例在实行的过程中,对于它的地位争议一直不断。本文将从中国的指导性案例与国外判例的比较、与司法解释的比较及与“法官造法”的比较中,总结分析指导性案例的效力及其在中国法律体系中的地位。
In 2010, the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate respectively promulgated the “Provisions on Guiding Cases”, marking the formal establishment of the case guidance system in our country. As of March 2016, the Supreme Court has released 11 batches of 56 guiding cases, and the controversy over its position has continued during the implementation of the guiding case. This article summarizes the validity of the Guiding Cases and its position in the legal system of China by comparing the comparison between the Guiding Cases in China and those in other jurisdictions, the comparison with judicial interpretations and the comparison with “Making Judges”.