查莫斯宣称,他的认知二维语义学承认克里普克的模态与意义理论,并分别从模态论证与认知论证两个方面论述了这一点。但是,认知二维语义学诉诸模态理性主义一元论,而该理论违背了克里普克对认知模态与形而上模态的划分;并且,如果认知内涵框架可以整合指称的因果机制,那么,认知内涵就应当是一种元语义成分。因此,认知二维语义学并未真正地完全接受克里普克的模态与意义理论。 Chalmers claims that his cognitive two-dimensional semantics acknowledges Kripke’s Modal and Meaning Theory, and discusses it from two aspects: modal argument and cognitive argument. However, cognitive two-dimensional semantics resorts to the monistic rationalism, which violates Kripke’s division of cognitive modality and metaphysical modalities; and if the cognitive contextual framework can integrate the alleged causal mechanisms , Then, cognitive connotation should be a meta-semantic component. Therefore, cognitive two-dimensional semantics does not really fully accept Kripke’s modality and meaning theory.