论文部分内容阅读
当前,困惑中共党史研究的主要问题是:第一,固守于陈旧的党史体系。迄今,中共党史的历史框架基本上还是50年代初形成的以《联共(布)党史简明教程》为范本的党史体系。这个体系至少有三个弊端:1.不适当地夸大领袖个人在历史上的作用;2.把阶级斗争和路线斗争扩大化;3.过分偏重于党自身的发展。第二,研究内容浅薄。党史研究长期停留在低层次的资料介绍、史实考证、人物评价、文献论证等方面,重复现成的公式与结论.缺乏高屋建瓴,从宏观上探讨革命兴衰成败的规律和对革命作横向比较与纵向探源。第三,就思维方法来说,党史研究基本上是一种平面式的线性思维。只注重党自身的发展,不重视对党所存在的社会的综合考察;重视成功的经验,不重视失败的教训。考察人物时,只重外在表现,不考察
At present, the main problems confusing the study of the history of the CPC are: First, stick to the old history system of the Party. So far, the historical framework of the CPC history is basically the party history system formed in the early 1950s with the “Concise Guide to the History of the Communist Party (Bolshevik)” as its template. This system has at least three drawbacks: 1. Inappropriately exaggerating the individual’s role in history; 2. Enlarging the class struggle and the line struggle; 3. Overly emphasizing the party’s own development. Second, the research content is shallow. The study of the history of the party has long been stuck in low-level materials introduction, historical facts, character evaluation, literature argumentation, etc., repeating the established formulas and conclusions.It lacks of high house building and macroscopically discusses the law of the rise and fall of the revolution and the horizontal comparison and vertical Exploration source. Third, as far as ways of thinking are concerned, the study of the history of the Party is basically a kind of planar linear thinking. Only pay attention to the development of the party itself, do not attach importance to the comprehensive investigation of the existence of the party society; emphasis on successful experience, do not attach importance to the lessons of failure. When examining people, they only emphasize external manifestations and do not examine them