论文部分内容阅读
1980年前，货车修理费由路局（分局）管理，修理实际支出直接进入各局的运输成本，在部对各局运输成本计划确定后，修车越多，支出越大，运输成本越高。另一方面路局按完成周转量向部取得运输收入，多修定检货车不但不能直接增加周转量而取得收入，而且多修车所增加的支出得不到补偿。因此路局（分局）不愿多承担定检修车任务。由于多修车吃亏，路局（分局）对车
Before 1980, the cost of repairing freight wagons was managed by the railway bureaus (sub-bureaus), repairing the transportation costs of actual billets that went directly to bureaus. After the bureaus had determined the transportation cost plans for bureaus, the more vehicles they had to pay, the greater their spending and the higher the cost of transportation. On the other hand, the LRT obtained the transport revenue from the Department according to the completion turnover, and more than the revised VG can not directly increase the turnover and obtain revenue. Moreover, the additional expenses for repairing vehicles are not compensated. Therefore, the Bureau (Branch) is unwilling to assume the task of inspection car. Because more car repair loss, Road Bureau (Branch) of the car