论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨可塑纤维桩在口腔残根修复中的临床效果。方法:选取2012年10月至2013年12月来我院进行治疗的患者50例,按照治疗方式的不同分为对照组和观察组,对照组患者24例,观察组患者26例。对照组患者使用传统的纤维桩进行治疗,观察组患者使用可塑纤维桩进行治疗,对患者进行为期三个月的随访,比较两组患者治疗的总有效率。结果:经过治疗后,对照组患者在随访的过程中有7例患者出现牙龈发炎的情况,治疗总有效率为70.83%;观察组患者仅有1例出现牙龈发炎的情况,治疗的总有效率为96.15%,P<0.05,具有显著性差异和统计学意义。结论:从本次研究中两种口腔残根修复方式上来看可塑纤维桩比传统的纤维桩治疗效果更加明显,适合在临床中大力推广使用。
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of plastic fiber posts in the repair of oral residual roots. Methods: Fifty patients who came to our hospital for treatment from October 2012 to December 2013 were divided into control group and observation group according to different treatment methods. There were 24 patients in control group and 26 patients in observation group. Patients in the control group were treated with traditional fiber posts. Patients in the observation group were treated with plastic fiber posts. The patients were followed up for three months. The total effective rate was compared between the two groups. Results: After treatment, 7 patients in the control group showed gum inflammation during the follow-up. The total effective rate was 70.83%. Only 1 patient in the observation group had gingival inflammation. The total effective rate of treatment 96.15%, P <0.05, with significant difference and statistical significance. Conclusion: From the two methods of oral residual root repair in this study, the plastic fiber post is more obvious than the traditional fiber post treatment, which is suitable for clinical use.