论文部分内容阅读
货物买卖合同应当采用什么形式?这些形式各有什么利弊?许多国家对此都发生过激烈的争论。美国在制定和实施《诈欺法》过程中积累的经验,可以给我们一些有益的启示。美国承袭英国法制。英国在资本主义发展的初期,为了保证交易的安全,防止诈欺与伪证的发生,强调合同的书面形式。1677年,英国制定了著名的《诈欺与伪证法》。其第17条规定:“价金在10英镑以上的货物买卖合同,除非买方愿意接受并在实际上收到部分所买之物,或诚实地给予卖方某物以保证履行交易,或给予卖方部分价金,或将交易书写于文书或备忘录上并由合同当事人或其法律认可的代理人签字,否则无效。”按照这条规定,买卖标
What forms of contracts should be used for the sale of goods? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each of these forms? Many countries have heated arguments on this. The accumulated experience gained by the United States in formulating and implementing the “fraud law” can give us some helpful enlightenments. The United States inherits the British legal system. In the early days of the development of capitalism, the United Kingdom emphasized the contractual form of writing in order to ensure the security of transactions and prevent fraud and perjury. In 1677, Britain made the famous “Fraud and Perjury Law.” Article 17 states: “Contracts for the sale of goods of a price over £ 10 unless the buyer is willing to accept and actually receive part of the purchased goods or give the seller honestly something to guarantee the performance of the transaction or to the seller Part of the price, or write the transaction on an instrument or memorandum and signed by the parties to the contract or their agents recognized by law, or null and void. ”Under this provision, the bidder