《经典释文》和《左传正义》均载有《别录》所记《左传》的传授世系。长期以来,学者对这条世系的真伪多有争论。然而,持伪观点的论证均不够严密,因而不能否定传统的说法。清华简《系年》的公布,更可证明《别录》所记的《左传》世系并非凭空臆造,而是渊源有自。不过,从古书流传的规律来看,其对《左传》传授流传的描述也存在过于片面的问题。 “Classic Interpretation” and “Zuo Chuan Justice” are contained in the “Do not record” recorded “Zuo Zhuan” teaching lineage. For a long time, scholars have much debate on the authenticity of this lineage. However, arguments that hold false arguments are not rigorous enough to deny the conventional wisdom. Tsinghua University “Year” announcement, but also prove that “Do not record” recorded in the “Zuo Zhuan” lineage is not empty-handedly created, but origin has its own. However, judging from the circulating rules of ancient books, there are also too one-sided questions about the circulating descriptions of Zuo Zhuan.