批评是体验之后压抑不住的语言倾诉,它以刚直不阿的发言干扰着文学的步伐,鼓励或阻滞着文学的进步;文学文本的指涉是无尽的,而批评却永远无法囊括所有本文的所指,每一种批评都振振有词却意见相左,也许文学在根本意义上不能被批评,批评永远接近不了文学的真实,只要你一批评,你就错了,然而如果没有了批评,文学将会孤寂难耐。当批评家多半不是批评家的本意,他们大多是从事创作而失败了的人于是一干起批评,自卑和自傲成了他们发言的心理基调。批评家都是智慧型的,是很灵智也很理智的家伙,他们在很多方面是优秀的,却又出奇地平凡,他们的名字与作家、歌唱家、科学家们放在一起显得黯然失色,可他们毫不介意。 Criticism is the irresistible language of conversation after experiencing it. It confuses the straightforward speech with the pace of literature and encourages or impedes the progress of literature. Literary text refers to endlessness, but criticism can never cover all the texts Means that every criticism is full of vociferous opinions and disagreements. Perhaps literature can not be criticized in the fundamental sense. Criticism can never approach the reality of literature. If you criticize you, you are wrong. However, without criticism, literature will be lonely Impatient. When critics are mostly not the critics’ intention, most of them who failed in their creative work began to criticize themselves. Their inferiority and self-esteem became the psychological tone of their speeches. Critics are intelligent, very smart and very sensible guys, who are excellent in many ways but surprisingly trivial, whose names appear eclipsed by writers, singers and scientists alike. They do not mind.