今天午后,偶尔翻开了《国画家》,看到2002年三期刊登尚辉先生的文章《从笔墨个性走向图式个性》。该文发在本期杂志卷首,又配以大量的史料性图片,应该说是一篇分量很重的,将在国画界产生一定影响的文章。然而文中的观点却令人难以苟同,甚至不安。虽然本人不擅写作,但有些话如鲠在喉,不得不说出来以期与尚辉先生商椎:首先我要说的足尚辉先生把笔墨与图式分开来述叙,并以此来评判古人今人的得失和历史的发展与进程。看后我感到观点偏颇并有悖历史事实。我们只要认真地想一下就可以发现古人重笔墨轻图式的说法欠妥,其实古人的图式也是因人而异千变万化,岂能轻易作如此结论。比如石涛,他一生作品丰厚,却极少雷同。他无论大幅还是小品 Today afternoon, we occasionally opened the “Chinese Painter” and saw the article entitled “From the Character of Pen and Ink to the Figure Personality” in the third issue of 2002. This article was first published in this issue of magazine and was accompanied by a large amount of historical material pictures. It should be said that there is a heavy volume of articles that will exert some influence on the Chinese painting circle. However, the views in the article are difficult to agree, or even uneasy. Although I am not good at writing, I have to say something like I am in the throat. I have to say it in the hope of establishing business relationship with Mr. Shang Hui. First, I will say that Mr. Zu Shanghui separate the brushwork from the drawing to describe the present and the present The gains and losses and the historical development and process. After reading, I feel biased and contrary to historical facts. As long as we seriously think about it, we can find that the ancients used the rhetoric of light and pictorialism is defective. In fact, the patterns of the ancients vary from person to person. How can we easily conclude this? Such as Shi Tao, his rich works of life, but rarely identical. He is no matter large or small