论文部分内容阅读
17世纪中叶儒者在亡国之痛中藉由回归传统经典，从事新的研究工作。他们注意到原属于道教的思想学说阑入儒学，尤其集中于易学之中，兹事体大，必须将儒道之间的界线划分清楚。此即本文所称“儒道之辨”。胡渭《易图明辨》一直被视为当时最具代表性、最能穷溯本末的一部易学著作。本文除前言和结论外，主要分为四个部分：1.介绍《易图明辨》写作背景、胡渭生平及其进入儒道之辨论辩的历程；2.分析《易图明辨》的整体撰著方法；3.分析《易图明辨》对易图源流发展中三个重要问题所作的分判；4.分析“儒道之辨”中“破”、“立”及“补”三个历程，以见《易图明辨》一书在学术史上的位置。结论认为，在“儒道之辨”的第一阶段，学者直接攻击北宋以降的易图之学，着意于“破”而非“立”；胡渭《易图明辨》标识了第二个阶段，为历代易图种种相关的学说寻觅其各自的源流归属，在这基础上再行评价，亦即重在“立”而非“破”。第一、第二阶段所未解决的关于朱子易图思想的问题，历经王懋及纪昀等学者的辨正，重在补充，为第三阶段。
The mid-17th century Confucians engaged in new research work by returning to the traditional classics in the pain of subjugating the nation. They noticed that Confucianism, which belonged to Taoist ideology, was imprinted in Confucianism, especially in Yi-ology. As a matter of fact, the boundary between Confucianism and Taoism must be clearly divided. This is what this article called “the distinction between Confucianism and Taoism.” Hu Wei’s “easy to understand and discernment” has always been regarded as one of the most representative and most extinct books of the time easy to learn. In addition to the preface and conclusion, this article is divided into four parts: 1. Introducing the writing background of “easy to understand and discernable”, Hu Wei’s life and the process of debate on Confucianism and Daoism; 2. As a whole the method of writing; 3. Analysis of “easy to figure out clearly” on the three major issues in the development of Yi Tuo source of the sub-trial; 4. Analysis of “Confucianism and Taoism,” “broken”, “legislation” and “complement” A journey to see the book “easy to understand and discernment” in the academic history of the position. The conclusion is that in the first phase of “the distinction between Confucianism and Taoism,” scholars directly attack the Northern Song Dynasty to reduce the easy to learn, intended to “break” rather than “stand”; Hu Wei “easy to identify” identifies the second Stage, for various Yi doctrines related to the past to find their own source of attribution, on the basis of re-evaluation, that is, focusing on “legislation” rather than “broken.” In the first and second phases, the unresolved issues concerning the thought of easy-to-use Zhu Zi were rectified and emphasized by scholars such as Wang Mao- and Ji Yun, and they were added as the third stage.