论文部分内容阅读
目的:探究阴道镜活检、TCT检查以及LEEP活检方法应用在CIN疾病中的诊断价值,对比这3种检查方法的不同之处。方法:选取100例经过采用TCT检查诊断为CIN病人作为研究对象,对全部患者进行阴道镜活检以及LEEP检查,最后对比分析LEEP活检方法与采用阴道镜活检、TCT进行检查的病理结果。结果:阴道镜活检方法与TCT检查获得诊断数据完全符合率是65.2%,而LEEP活检方法与TCT检查结果符合率是69.6%,并且诊断不足概率为18.4%,诊断过度概率为11.5%;LEEP活检与阴道镜活检对比:完全符合率是38.3%,诊断不足概率为9.2%,诊断过度概率为21.8%。结论:单独采用阴道镜活检方法来完成CIN疾病诊断工作,获得准确性不佳,而阴道镜活检方法并不能取代LEEP活检手段;TCT检查可作为辅助诊断CIN疾病的一种有效手段。
OBJECTIVE: To explore the diagnostic value of colposcopy biopsy, TCT and LEEP biopsy in the diagnosis of CIN and to compare the differences between these three methods. Methods: 100 cases of patients with CIN who were diagnosed as TCT were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent colposcopy biopsy and LEEP examination. Finally, the pathological results of LEEP biopsy and colposcopy biopsy and TCT were analyzed. Results: The coincidence rate between colposcopy biopsy and TCT was 65.2%. The coincidence rate between LEEP biopsy and TCT was 69.6%, and the rate of diagnosis was 18.4% and the rate of diagnosis was 11.5%. LEEP biopsy Contrast with colposcopy biopsy: the full compliance rate was 38.3%, the probability of inadequate diagnosis was 9.2%, and the probability of diagnosis was 21.8%. CONCLUSION: Colposcopy biopsy alone can be used to diagnose CIN and get poor accuracy. Colposcopy biopsy can not replace LEEP biopsy method. TCT can be used as an effective method to diagnose CIN.