论文部分内容阅读
中共建政之初,政权尚待巩固之际,全国出现匪夷所思的“称王称帝”事件不下百起。作为个案“称王称帝”事件的安徽“韩朝”暴乱案,其实是许多农业社社员个体参加的、组织化程度相对较低、所追求的社会变革目标是回到小农传统理想社会的农民式反叛,即暴乱。该案是粮食统购统销及农业合作化实践、一贯道道首及道徒煽惑、干群矛盾与冲突、社员本身的迷信谣言及升官发财思想作祟等因素共同作用的结果。该案发生后,地方政府即进行剿抚并举的意识形态化应对,在各级党委与政府有效的社会控制及强大的组织动员面前,该案在初始阶段即被平息。平息之后,该案作为典型反革命案例,随即进入司法实践层面,通过此暴乱案在预审、终审、宣判及执刑过程中一定程度的挖掘与描述,可见,加强中共的集中领导与控制、一定程度上遵守审判程序、贯彻群众路线及考虑案犯罪恶的历史与现行关系,是建国初中共最为重要的司法实践逻辑。通过该案的研究,为此种司法逻辑实践提供一个详实的个案研究补充。
At the very beginning of the CCP’s establishment of political power, the political power has yet to be consolidated. As a result, there have been so many incredible events in the country that “the emperor is called”. The case of “rioting in Korea and North Korea” as a case of “reigning Emperor” is actually a participation of many members of the agricultural community with a relatively low degree of organization. The goal of social transformation is to return to the tradition of smallholder farmers Peasant-style rebellion in ideal society, namely riots. The case was the result of the combined effect of the state monopoly of food monopoly and the practice of agricultural co-operation, the constant incitement of gangsters, the incitement of leaders and cadres, the contradictions and conflicts between cadres and the masses, the rumors of members’ superstitious beliefs and the thought of promotion of wealth and fortune. After the incident, the local government carried out an ideological response to the suppression and suppression. Before the effective social control and strong organizational mobilization by party committees and governments at all levels, the case was subdued in the initial stage. Subsided, the case as a typical case of counter-revolution, and then into the judicial practice level, through this riot case in the pre-trial, final review, sentencing and execution of a certain extent during the excavation and description, we can see that to strengthen the CPC’s centralized leadership and control, to some extent It is the most important judicial practice logic of the CCP since the founding of the People’s Republic of China that abide by the judicial procedures, carry out the mass line and consider the history and current relations of the criminal crimes. Through the case study, it provides a detailed case study supplement for such judicial logic practice.