论文部分内容阅读
(上接2016年第5期第8页)需要指出的是,就像人格权之及于身体一样,从病理标本载体形式我们可以看出病理标本无论是器官、组织还是细胞甚至基因,在某些特定情况下都可以认定为人格权的延伸,而非仅仅是物权的支配。王泽鉴教授将德国精子灭失案放在其侵权行为法著作有关于对“身体权、健康权”侵害的部分,并强调"人格的自主决定在一定的要件下,应延长存在于与
(Continued on page 5 2016 第 8 页) It should be pointed out that, just as the power of personality and the body, from the pathological specimen carrier form we can see that pathological specimens, whether organs, tissues or cells and even genes in a In some cases, it can be regarded as an extension of personal rights, not just the domination of real rights. Professor Wang Zejian placed the case of German sperm loss on the part of his law of infringement on the part that infringed on the right to health and the right to health and stressed that the independent decision of personality should be extended under certain conditions.