论文部分内容阅读
科学奖励评价的普遍主义和社会建构主义两种理论范式在哲学理念、理论基础和具体观点上长期存在分歧。学界对两种科学奖励评价的超越努力往往因它们巨大的理论分歧而收效甚微。换位评价从新的视角来思考科学奖励评价,既具有评价的多元性、动态性,也是对以往定性评价哲学理念的超越,不失为对普遍主义和社会建构主义科学奖励评价的一种合理超越视角。
The two theoretical paradigms of universalism and social constructivism in scientific reward evaluation have long existed differences in philosophical concepts, theoretical bases and concrete points of view. The academic effort to go beyond the two types of scientific reward evaluation often has very little effect because of their huge theoretical disagreements. Evaluation of transposition Scientific reward evaluation from a new perspective not only has the diversity and dynamic of evaluation, but also transcendence of the philosophy of qualitative evaluation in the past, which is a reasonable transcendence of the scientific evaluation of universalism and social constructivism.