上个世纪二十年代,胡适与容庚曾就一部《红楼梦》120回抄本展开论争。容庚认为他在冷摊上购到的那部抄本就是《红楼梦》的原本,而胡适却认为抄本与程乙本完全相同,它就是抄自程乙本,没有任何价值。80年后的今天,笔者终于看到了这部当年胡适在论争中始终都没有看到的抄本,才发现,它既不是容庚说的原本,也不是胡适断言的程乙本,而是另外一部我们都未见过的本子。 In the 1920s, Hu Shi and Rong Geng held a debate on a 120-copy copy of A Dream of Red Mansions. Rong Geng think he bought in the cold stall that copy is the original “Dream of Red Mansions”, and Hu Shih think the transcripts and Cheng Yi this exactly the same, it is copied from Cheng Bibin, there is no value. Today, 80 years later, I finally saw the transcript that Hu Shi had never seen in the controversy. Only then did she find out that it was neither the original version of Rong Geng nor the Cheng-Hsun asserted by Hu Shi, but the other one of us Have never seen the book.