论文部分内容阅读
四、要运用逻辑思维,善于逻辑推理研究任何问题,要想得出正确的结论,就必须运用逻辑思维,善于逻辑推理,不然的话,就会错误百出。历代《伤寒论》注家,之所以往往犯有死抠字眼、咬文嚼字、牵强附会、故弄玄虚、断章取义、以偏概全、画蛇添足、主观想象等错误,除了如前所述,未与《内》《难》相结合,或缺乏临床实践外,大都是缺乏逻辑思维和逻辑推理的缘故。抠字眼等问题,前面已讲了一些,下面再就其余的问题,略作举例。牵强附会。如前述之少阴三急下证,解为中阴溜腑,把少阴表证当作太少两感,就是牵强附会。下面再举一例作说明: 141条,“病在阳,应以汗解之,反以冷水(?)之,若灌之,其热被劫不得去,弥更益烦,肉上粟起,意欲饮水,反不渴者,服文蛤散,不差者,与
Fourth, to use logical thinking, good at logical reasoning to study any issue, in order to reach the correct conclusion, we must use logical thinking, good at logical reasoning, otherwise, it will be full of mistakes. The ancestors of the “Treatise on Febrile Diseases” in the past have often made mistakes such as dead words, words, far-fetched quotes, tricks, out of context, partiality, superfluousism, and subjective imagination. Difficulties combined with or lack of clinical practice are mostly due to lack of logical thinking and logical reasoning. Some of the issues mentioned above have already been mentioned. We will give some examples for the remaining issues. Far-fetched. As mentioned above, the Shaoyin Sanjiu Xiazhi, the solution is the middle-yellow slippery, and the Shaoyin’s surname is considered as too few two senses, which is far-fetched. Let’s give another example to illustrate: 141, “The disease is in the yang, and it should be solved with sweat, and instead of cold water (?), if you irrigate, the heat will not be robbed, and Mi will be more annoying and flesh Those who want to drink water, those who don’t thirsty, those who serve essays, who are not bad, and who