论文部分内容阅读
2011年岁末,财新《新世纪》周刊发表《达芬奇案中案》的系列文章,将达芬奇家具“假名牌”事件再次拉回公众视野。报道披露,此前中央电视台所做的《达芬奇密码》系列报道可能存在真相性缺失、预设立场的问题,并存在央视调查记者在报道中及报道后“敲诈勒索”达芬奇家居的嫌疑,报道提到达芬奇在被央视报道存在原产地和广告宣传“造假”之后,累计花费将近2000万元用于“公关”与“和解”。
At the end of 2011, Caixin “New Century” magazine published a series of articles in the “Da Vinci Case”, bringing the Leonardo da Vinci furniture and “fake brand names” back to the public view again. Reports revealed that after CCTV’s “Da Vinci Code” series of reports there may be a lack of truth, the problem of the preconceived position, and there CCTV investigators in the report and after the report “extortion ” Leonardo da Vinci home Suspicion, the report mentioned Da Vinci reported by CCTV presence and advertising “fraud”, the cumulative cost of nearly 20 million yuan for “PR ” and “reconciliation ”.