论文部分内容阅读
2009年,网友“叶老师”在“人教论坛”针对江苏名师诸向阳执教的《特殊的葬礼》一课,真诚的谈了自己的看法和质疑,同时抛出了“辩课”的提法,一时间“辩课”成为了教研界的热词。所谓辩课,其实是针对评课而言的,一个“辩”字展示了这种研课模式的精髓,必然有思维的交锋,必然有观点的碰撞。这跟传统的和风细雨、一团和气式的评课有明显的不同。然而,一个新提法的产生、发展和成熟,必然有一个过程,如何把握“辩课”的理念和模式,如何让“辩课”更有效的为课堂教学服务,如何把我们的常态课“辩”成精品课。基于此,我们精心安排了一组文章,分别从“辩课”的必要性、形式以及需要把握的原则等方面进行了一些探讨,试图让教师了解这种新的教研模式,切实为一线教研助力。
In 2009, netizen “Ye teacher ” talked in good faith about his own views and doubts on the “special funeral” course taught by teachers in Jiangsu province at the forum of “People Education Forum” Lesson “reference, a time ” debate “has become a hot word in the teaching and research community. The so-called debate, in fact, is for the review of terms, a ”debate “ the word demonstrates the essence of this research model, there must be confrontational thinking, there must be a collision of perspectives. This is the traditional style and style, a group style and appraisal are significantly different. However, the emergence, development and maturation of a new formulation must have a process of how to grasp the concept and mode of ”disputation“ and how to make ”disputation“ serve more effectively the teaching of class and how to treat us Normal class ”debate “ into a quality course. Based on this, we have arranged a series of essays carefully to discuss some issues such as the necessity and form of ”disputation" and the principles that need to be grasped so as to make teachers understand the new teaching and research model effectively Teaching and research help.