一、历史的误区 在书画鉴定工作中,对所鉴定的作品掌握的资料有多少、可靠性有多大将直接影响到鉴定工作的准确性。如果此件作品可查资料少,依据性不足,经验也不足,那么对此件作品的鉴定就存在着误区。我们在对许多新出土文物的鉴定中,常常遇到这样的问题。著名鉴定专家徐邦达先生讲,他过去鉴定过的作品,当时资料少,依据少,比对少,把它定为真迹,今天随着时间的推移,利用新发现的资料进行研究,再进行反复比较认知,他又推翻了原先的结论。这就 First, the historical misunderstanding In the painting and calligraphy identification work, the identification of the work to master the number of information, how much reliability will have a direct impact on the accuracy of identification. If this piece of work can check the information less, based on lack of experience is not enough, then there is a misunderstanding of this piece of work there. We often encounter such problems in the identification of many newly unearthed cultural relics. Mr. Xu Bangda, a famous expert in identification, said that the works he had identified in the past were less data-based and less-than-matched and regarded as authentic. Today, with the passage of time, the use of newly discovered information for research and then repeated comparison Cognitive, he overthrew the original conclusion. This is