全国人大审议通过的物权法没有典权制度,这无疑是物权法的重大缺失。典权虽然是发源于我们自身传统的法律,但是具有类似社会功效的同种物权制度却并非中国所独有。通过比较分析中国的典权,德国的担保用益,法国、意大利、日本的不动产质权和韩国民法的传贳权,证明各国对类似典权的物权类型的需求和中国典权纳入物权法的必要性。 The National People’s Congress examined and approved the Real Right Law without an exclusive right system, which is undoubtedly a material absence of material law. Although the code is derived from the law of our own tradition, but with similar social effects of the same property rights system is not unique to China. By comparative analysis of the canonical powers in China, the guarantee benefits of Germany, the immovable property pledges of France, Italy and Japan, and the transfer of Korean civil law, it is proved that the demand of various types of real right types in the state power and the incorporation of Chinese dianquan into the property law Sex.