看了《乐器》杂志2003年第八期陈兴华先生的文章后,笔者有些感受。从标题上说的是“从乐器基本属性谈二胡改革改良”,实际说的是从乐器属性讲二胡只能改良,不能改革。而他所作的改良有三:一是微调硬质千斤;二是加粗琴杆,他的说法是“只要有可能怎样加粗的琴杆都不算过分”,二胡琴杆在两弦拉力下,必须长期稳定纹丝不动;三是缩短弦轴的长度,以减少对琴杆的拉力。最后的结论是“这些需要专业人士去研究并使之完善”。 其实,陈先生所谓解决了的 After reading the eighth article of “Musical Instruments” magazine in 2003, Mr. Chen Xinghua’s article, I feel some. Say from the title is “from the basic properties of the instrument to talk about Erhu reform and improvement”, the actual thing is to say from the instrument properties Erhu can only be improved, can not be reform. And he made three improvements: First, fine-tuning hard; two is harp piano, his argument is “as long as possible how bold bolting is not excessive,” erhu piano rod in the two-string tension, Long-term stability must be motionless; Third, shorten the length of the peg to reduce the tension on the piano. The final conclusion is that “these require professionals to study and refine it.” In fact, Mr. Chen said the so-called solution