近年来,理论界就“犯罪构成理论”这一问题展开了复杂交错的争论和对话,主要体现在重构论、维持论和改良论之间的批评与反批评。本文在梳理我国犯罪构成理论争议的基础,认为我们应当抛开三阶层还是四要件的桎梏,立足于中国本土,真正从解决司法实践中所遇到的难题出发研究适合中国国情的犯罪构成体系。 In recent years, theorists have carried out complicated and interlaced debates and dialogues on the issue of “constitution of crimes”, mainly in the criticisms and counter-criticisms between reconstructionism, maintenanceism and improvementism. This article combs the theoretical controversy of crime in our country and thinks that we should abandon the coercion of the third class or the fourth element and base ourselves on the native land of our country to start from the difficult problems in the judicial practice to study the criminal constitution system suitable for China’s national conditions.