论文部分内容阅读
近年来,对文学作品原型批评的文章经常见诸报端,除此之外,利用现有的文学原型进行现实实践的批判也越来越多,但这种批评实践仅局限于对文学作品中的人物、故事情节、叙事方式的原型分析。原型批评的最大优势是整体性的批评,所以这种局限在局部的小范围的批评并不能发挥原型批评的优势和特点。文学评论家诺斯洛普·弗莱就曾对此做出过解释,强调要从整体上把握作品,评论者要站在更高的层面上把作品放在更大的文学范围内来进行批评,从现实性和历史性的角度考察作品与同时代的其他作品的关系,并对作品做出客观的评价。
In recent years, articles criticizing literary prototypes have often appeared in the newspapers. In addition, there are more and more critiques of the actual practice using the existing literary prototypes. However, this criticism practice is limited to literary works Archetypal analysis of characters, story lines and narrative styles. The biggest advantage of archetypal criticism is holistic criticism, so the criticism, localized in a small area, can not give full play to the advantages and features of archetypal criticism. Literary critic Northrop Frye once made an explanation of this, stressing that the work should be grasped as a whole, and critics should stand on a higher level to criticize the work within the larger literature scope , Examine the relationship between the work and other works of the same age from the realistic and historical point of view, and make an objective assessment of the work.