论文部分内容阅读
本刊2007年第12期,刊发了江苏宋文伟老师的文章“三问何永康教授”.讨论了高考作文中的“打捞”问题。这里,周建成老师将“打捞”给升格为“打捞”业.打捞范围也延伸至中学作文教学。打捞也好,打捞业也罢,只是个说法而已,但谈及的问题却触及到了作文教学、作文高考的一些深层问题。教授下水打捞是福是祸?一篇“赤兔之死的打捞,明明与20世纪初的那场文化运动相悖.却仍然让其闪亮登场,这打捞当如何定性?二是高考作文阅卷的操作是否该有个更为严格的规范?一笔下去,近20分的差距,这可是会左右一个考生命运的大数。据说,某省动用研究生阅卷,甚至有体育系的研究生,这,这如何保证赋分的客观、公正与准确?三是考场炫示与作文本质的脱节谁之过?如果没有满分作文的亮相,没有阅卷细节的暴料,这种种问题会潜藏多少年。但愿我们今天的讨论能廓清一些认识,触动高考作文考试系统的调整与改革.使作文教学能真正走出困境。(文晋)
In the 12th issue of 2007, published an article by Jiangsu Song Wenwei’s teacher, ”Three Questions He Yongkang, Professor.“ Discusses the problem of ”harvest“ in college entrance examination essays. Here, Zhou Chengjian’s teacher will “salvage” to “a salvage” industry. The salvage range is also extended to secondary school composition teaching. Whether salvage or salvage is worth mentioning, it is just a matter of saying. However, the problems discussed have touched on some deep problems in composition teaching and composition. Professor salvage is a blessing or an accident? An ”Red rabbit’s death salvage, obviously contrary to the cultural movement of the early 20th century. but still let it shine, how is this salvage qualitative? second is the college entrance examination composition examination Whether the operation should have a more stringent norm? A stroke that goes on, the difference of nearly 20 minutes, this will be a large number of tests of life. It is said that a province uses graduate student reading, and even graduate students in the sports department, How can this guarantee the objectiveness, impartiality, and accuracy of scoring? Third, who is the disconnect between the examination room and the quality of the text? If there is no appearance of a perfect composition, or if there is no evidence of reading the details, there will be many years of hidden problems. Today’s discussion can clarify some understandings and touch the adjustment and reform of the college entrance examination system, so that composition teaching can really get out of the predicament.