论文部分内容阅读
目的比较微创手术和传统手术治疗小儿疝气的临床治疗效果。方法选取太和县中医院2012年7月至2014年7月门诊及住院部收治的70例小儿疝气患者为研究对象,按照手术方法的不同将其分为实验组和对照组,实验组实施微创手术,对照组实施传统手术,观察两组患儿的临床疗效、手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间以及术后并发症情况。结果两组患者均成功完成手术,实验组临床治疗总有效率明显高于对照组,手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、术后总并发症率显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用微创手术治疗小儿疝气比传统手术更具有优势,疗效显著,手术时间短,术中出血量少,并发症少,安全性高,患儿恢复快,值得临床应用及推广。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of minimally invasive surgery and traditional surgery in children with hernia. Methods Seventy cases of infantile hernia admitted to outpatient department and inpatient department of Taihe Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from July 2012 to July 2014 were selected as experimental subjects and divided into experimental group and control group according to different surgical methods. The patients in the control group were treated with conventional surgery. The clinical curative effect, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative complications were observed. Results The two groups of patients completed the operation successfully. The total effective rate of clinical trial in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative total complication rate were significantly lower than those in the control group Significance (P <0.05). Conclusion Minimally invasive surgery is superior to traditional surgery in hernia. The curative effect is obvious, the operation time is short, the intraoperative blood loss is less, the complication is less, the safety is higher and the recovery is faster. It is worthy of clinical application and promotion.