论文部分内容阅读
欧盟反倾销法规把外国出口企业在反倾销诉讼中的应诉或不应诉行为称为“合作”或“不合作”。合作或不合作完全由企业自愿。选择合作的企业,主要应在规定的期限内回答有关问卷,接受欧盟的调查,他们所提供的有关资料为欧盟裁定提供参考依据;对于不合作企业,欧盟对他们没有什么奖励,只能根据其掌握的现有资料做出裁定,这些资料很有可能对企业非常不利,因为它们有可能就是起诉方指控的内容。所以,与合作企业相比,不合作企业往往处于不利地位。这一点尤其在单独确定出口商反倾销税时表现得尤为明显。因此,出口商在遇到反倾销诉讼时,应从法律和事实的角度认真、谨慎地审查是否与欧盟合作。 一、出口商参加合作以降低反倾销税 以往欧盟对中国产品征收的反倾销税是单一的且
The EU anti-dumping law refers to the “responding” or “non-cooperation” of the respondent or non-respondent in the anti-dumping proceedings of a foreign-exporting enterprise. Cooperation or non-cooperation is entirely voluntary by the enterprise. The enterprises that choose to cooperate should mainly answer the relevant questionnaire within the prescribed time limit and accept the EU investigation. The relevant information they provide provides a reference basis for the EU ruling. For the non-cooperative enterprises, the EU does not give any reward to them but only according to its It is very likely that the data will be very unfavorable to the enterprises because they may be the content of the prosecution’s allegations. Therefore, compared with cooperative enterprises, non-cooperative enterprises are often at a disadvantage. This is particularly evident when the exporters’ anti-dumping duties are determined separately. Therefore, when exporters encounter anti-dumping lawsuits, they should carefully and cautiously examine whether they cooperate with the EU from a legal and factual point of view. I. Exporters Participate in Cooperation to Reduce Anti-dumping Duties In the past, the anti-dumping duties levied by the EU on Chinese products were single and