论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统在治疗无卵性功血过程中的疗效。方法:收集40例无卵性功血患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,各20例。对照组患者使用常规治疗方法即炔诺酮进行治疗,观察组患者使用左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统进行治疗,在两组患者治疗后观察两组患者的月经情况、血红蛋白、激素水平、肝肾功能、血脂情况以及患者对治疗的满意程度,并且做好相关的记录。结果:两组患者经过治疗后,无排卵性功血的情况均有所好转,但是观察组患者在月经情况、血红蛋白情况、以及在激素水平方面观察组患者明显优于对照组患者,差异显著具有统计学意义(P<0.05),但是两组患者的肝肾功能以及血脂水平没有明显的变化,在两组患者的满意程度方面,观察组患者的满意程度明显优于对照组患者。结论:在对无排卵性功血患者进行治疗的过程中,使用左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统的方法明显优于传统治疗方法中的炔诺酮的治疗方法,在实际的对无排卵性功血患者的治疗过程中值得推广应用。
Objective: To analyze the efficacy of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of anovulatory dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Methods: 40 cases of ovulation dysfunctional uterine bleeding patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 20 cases each. Patients in the control group were treated with norethindrone, a conventional treatment. Patients in the observation group were treated with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. After two groups of patients were treated, the menstrual status, hemoglobin, hormone levels, Liver and kidney function, blood lipids and patient satisfaction with the treatment, and do a good job related records. Results: After treatment, the situation of anovulatory dysfunctional uterine bleeding improved, but the patients in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group in terms of menstruation, hemoglobin and hormones, and the observation group was significantly better than the control group (P <0.05). However, there was no significant change in the liver and kidney function and blood lipid levels between the two groups. Satisfaction in the two groups was significantly better than that in the control group in the two groups. Conclusion: In the treatment of patients with anovulatory dysfunctional uterine bleeding, the method of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system is obviously better than the traditional treatment methods of norethindrone treatment, the actual ovulation-free In the process of treatment of sexual dysfunction, it is worth popularizing and applying.